A Fancy Feasting second-rate sidekick…

Saw Shrek the Third this evening. After the very original first and even better second films in the Shrek series, I had high expectations for the third. As far as films go, it was entertaining, with funny moments liberally scattered throughout. There were plenty of in-jokes, be it hat tips to other films, or references to other characters the actors have played.

Alas, compared to one and two, number three was disappointing. One and two were original and had something to say. Number three was more run of the mill, with a story as generic as they come. This isn’t to say that as a film on its own it isn’t a good film. Just as part of the Shrek trilogy, it was disappointing. I hope they don’t continue this trend and make a fourth!

This entry was posted in diary, films. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Fancy Feasting second-rate sidekick…

  1. Dave says:

    Was it suitable for under 15s or under 9s, I wonder, besides being not very good?
    Shrek 2 was a bit risque, I seem to remember.

  2. gerald says:

    I would think it would be suitable for under 9s – mostly pantomime style humour. Although thinking of some pantomimes I’ve seen…

Comments are closed.